KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "oral evidence required"
10154 result(s) found
Found 10154 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.
30 Nov -0001The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal heirs of Madhavrao Ramchandra More (appellants in SA/66/2003 an...
- 154
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.
30 Nov -0001The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...
- 168
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Wife and Co-Respondent, Upholds Divorce Decree on Grounds of Adultery, Desertion, and Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Wife's Voluntary Sexual Intercourse with Co-Respondent and Desertion Established by Preponderance of Probabilities.
29 Aug 2016The case involves two family court appeals arising from a divorce petition filed by Sushil (husband) against Sangeeta (wife) under Section 13(1)(i), (...
- 217
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Bail and Quashes Police Custody Remand Orders in Prison Corruption Case. Petitioner's Husband, a Police Constable, Granted Bail on Conditions as Investigation Complete and No Further Custodial Interrogation Required.
6 Feb 2023The petitioner, Sadhana Rathod, wife of arrested accused Ajinkya Rathod, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
1 Aug 2016The appellant, Milind s/o Govind Pandit, was convicted by the IV Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No.17/2003 on 1/10/2003 for of...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder, Acquits Others in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC sustained for accused who inflicted fatal injuries, while others acquitted for insufficient proof of common intention.
23 Oct 2013The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by convicted accused and a criminal application by the State seeking leave to appeal against acqui...
- 303
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award. Dispute Related to Charter Hire Agreement for Offshore Drilling, Involving Claims for Lost Equipment, Day Rates, and Demobilisation Fees.
20 Dec 2014The Bombay High Court considered an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Lt...
- 14
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135(1) of the Bombay Police Act; State Files Separate Appeal for Enhancement of Sentence. The appeals arise from a Sessions Court judgment convicting three accused for causing death by administering blows with sticks and a hoe, leading to gangrene and death six days later, amid claims of medical inconsistency and false implication.
16 Mar 2026The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad heard two criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar in Sessions Cas...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
14 Aug 2018The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...
- 102
