Search Results for "open delivery"

1781 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1781 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Non-Arbitrability. Disputes Relating to Termination for Convenience and Non-Compete Obligations Held Not Arbitrable Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Capalpha Trade Private Limited, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivered Common Order in Writ Petitions Seeking FIR Registration and SIT Investigation into Alleged Cartelization in TANGEDCO Transformer Tenders. The Court Examined Allegations of Identical Bidding and Inflated Procurement Costs Causing Loss of Rs.397 Crores to Public Exchequer.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, heard analogously by the Madras High Court. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Ministerial Order Reversing Market Fee Demand Under APMC Act. Imported Edible Oil Transaction Raises Questions of Agency and Marketing Under Section 31 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee against the order of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Nagpur Bench Delivers Oral Judgment on Challenge to Parole Rule. The Court examined whether the proviso to Rule 19 of the Bombay (Furlough and Parole) Rules 1959, restricting parole to once a year except in death cases, violates Article 21 of the Constitution.

These writ petitions, filed by convicts in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Bank's Claim for Recovery of Dues from Export Company and its Director. Dispute Centers on Alleged Agreement to Debit Cash Credit Account Upon Dishonour of Foreign Bills Purchased Under FBP Facility.

The suit was filed by Bank of India to recover Rs.5,67,332.51 with interest at 19.5% per annum from B.C. Mody Exports P. Ltd. (defendant no.1) and its...