Search Results for "double test"

515 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 515 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Allegation of Pushing Victim from Running Train Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Version.

The appellants, Kanchan Deokisanjee Panpalia and Tara Harishkumar Panpalia, were convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative and evidence lacked corroboration.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by the appellants who were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.496/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt or Liability. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld as Complainant Did Not Establish Legally Enforceable Debt.

The appellant, Nupur Sales Corporation, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 19.06.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Land Owner's Cross Objection for Enhanced Compensation After Supreme Court Remand. Reconsideration Limited to Valuation of Trees and Classification of Survey No. 336 as Irrigated or Dry Crop Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The land owner filed a cross objection seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case No.281/2006. The Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Order Beyond Three Months Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Interpretation of 'Such Detention' in Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution Confirmed to Refer to Preventive Detention, Not Period of Detention.

The case involved a constitutional challenge to an order of preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, as amended. The appellant, ...