Search Results for "demand notices"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "demand notices"

1702 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1702 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.

7 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part in Development Charge Levy Dispute. Development Charge on Already Developed Land Held Illegal Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

9 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Sir Gangadharrao Chitnavis Memorial Medical Research Trust, a charitable trust, owned Plot No. 56 at Temple Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(h) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Failure to Prove Demand and Default Within Three Months Renders Disqualification Invalid.

15 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Vishwanath s/o Kisan Dhage, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Wara Jahangir, in 2015. Respondent No.4, Suresh Ashruji Gawande...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

24 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Unauthorised Subletting Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Subtenant failed to prove lawful subletting as tenant did not obtain landlady's written consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

28 Jul 2016

The case involves a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the original defendant no.2 (petitioner no.1) and defendant ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Gutkha Excise Duty Case for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the CESTAT's findings on valuation and penalty were factual and not perverse, and no question of law arose under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

14 Jun 2018

The case involves appeals filed by M/s. Trishul Arecanut Granuels Private Limited and its Director, H.S. Nataraj, against the Commissioner of Central ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces CAV Order in Writ Petition Against Encroachment Removal Orders Under Panchayat Raj Rules. Petitioners Alleged to Have Suppressed Material Facts and Withdrawn Civil Suit.

13 Mar 2026

The Petitioners, Smt. Hombalamma and Sri Appaji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Against Partial Arbitral Awards in Koyna Hydro Electric Project Sub-Contract Dispute. Challenge to awards failing on grounds of settlement and coercion under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jan 2016

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (th...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010

8 Jan 2016

The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains MMRDA from Taking Coercive Actions in Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Demand for Construction Delay; Lease Deed Clauses on Time Limit and Additional Built-Up Area Interpreted

20 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Raghuleela Builders Private Limited and Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging t...

46 47 48 49 50

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)