Search Results for "block development officer"

1303 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1303 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petitions Against Delimitation of Wards in Mysuru and Tumakuru City Corporations Heard by High Court. Petitioners claimed violation of Section 21 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 and non-compliance with delimitation guidelines.

The judgment dealt with a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the delimitation of wards...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Appeals for Lack of Evidence and Limitation — Compensation Enhancement Denied Due to Failure to Prove Market Value and Delay in Filing Appeals.

The judgment pertains to a batch of appeals filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, against the judgment and award dated 06.04.2010 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition Against District Collector and Block Development Officer in OSR Land Encroachment Dispute. No Wilful Disobedience Found; Respondents Undertook to Maintain OSR Land as Open Area and Park Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The contempt petition arose from a writ petition (W.P.No.4431 of 2019) where the Court had earlier directed the removal of superstructures from an Ope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Disposal of Appeal Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act Before Removal of Encroachments in Thenpennai River Bed. Court Holds That Statutory Appeal Under Section 10 Must Be Decided Before Enforcement Action Against Alleged Encroachers.

The petitioner, Rajavel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents No. 1 t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Mandamus Seeking Demolition of Alleged Illegal Encroachment — Holds That Encroachment Dispute on Grama Natham Land Requires Adjudication by Civil Court or Tahsildar, Not Writ Court.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents, various government au...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Insufficient Notice Period. Notice Period of 15 Days Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Must Exclude Date of Notice and Date of Meeting.

The petitioner, Shaikh Jadanbee Shaikh Rais, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Garkheda-Jomala, Taluka Bhokardan, District Jalna. Respondent No.5, Sh...