Search Results for "available surplus"

518 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Established. Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 1,08,000 to Rs. 3,24,000 with 6% Interest.

The appellants, being the parents and minor brother of the deceased Jakir Tamboli, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Alleged License Breach. Deceased was a third party and insurer failed to prove willful breach of policy conditions under Section 149 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the dependents of deceased Ajay Avatade, who died in a road accident on 6th February 2012. The cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Shikshan Sevak Appointment Approval Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Education Officer's order cancelling approval without notice set aside; Deputy Director's appellate order also quashed.

The petitioner, Ku. Preeti d/o Lawrence Antic, was appointed as Shikshan Sevak in St. Anthony's High School, Nagpur, pursuant to an advertisement date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2004-05. Mere Change of Opinion Cannot Justify Reopening When All Material Facts Were Disclosed During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960 and the Bombay Public Trust Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reason to Believe — Amount Received on Retirement from Partnership Firm Held to be Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax.

The petitioners, Prashant S. Joshi and Dattaram Shridhar Bhosale, were partners in a real estate development partnership firm. They retired from the p...