Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1515 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1515 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Municipal Construction Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration Act — Respondent Forfeits Right to Appoint by Delay. The Court held that the ineligibility under Section 12(5) read with Seventh Schedule can be waived, and the Respondent forfeited its right to appoint an arbitrator by failing to act within the prescribed time.

27 Jan 2023

The Petitioner, PSP Projects Limited, a construction company, was awarded a contract by the Respondent, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Recovery of Liquidated Damages Pending Arbitral Adjudication. Recovery Proceedings Initiated Without Awaiting Outcome of Arbitral Tribunal Under Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 Are Unjustified.

30 Aug 2019

The appellant, a proprietorship firm registered as a Class 'A' contractor, was awarded two contracts for construction and maintenance of rural roads u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Family Arrangement Dispute Involving Public Trust. Clause 16 of MOU directing change in trust management held valid and enforceable under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Feb 2005

The petitioners, Shri Mahavir Prasad Mansinghka and another, challenged an arbitral award dated 25th November, 2002 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree-Holder's Petition Under Article 227 in Execution Proceedings — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Mandates Judgment-Debtor to File Affidavit of Assets. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the application for asset disclosure without considering the mandatory nature of Order XXI Rule 41 CPC.

30 Jul 2025

The petitioner, Ms. Sumita Abhishek Sundaram, is the decree-holder in a commercial execution proceeding (Com. Ex. 541 of 2024) pending before the LXXX...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Appeals in Part in Arbitration Dispute Over Interim Measures Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Clarifies That an Award Creditor Can Seek Interim Relief During Section 34 Proceedings to Secure the Award Amount.

31 Jul 2019

The case involves cross appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arising from a common order dated 1 July 2019 passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. The Court Reinstated the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Oral Agreement and Quantum of Damages.

20 Apr 2021

The appellant, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Si...

High Court

High Court Allows Interim Relief in Arbitration Case Pending Foreign Award Enforcement. Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Applies to Foreign Awards Under Section 2(2), and Filing of Part II Enforcement Petition Does Not Bar Interim Protection as Award Requires Positive Recognition to Become a Decree.

10 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in its Commercial Division, considered a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Time-Barred Counterclaim in Arbitration. Limitation for Counterclaim Runs from Date of Termination of Contract, Not from Subsequent Correspondence.

16 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from an order dated 1 October 2012 passed by a learned Single Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Limitation period for filing petition under Section 34 runs from date of receipt of award, and application under Section 33 does not extend limitation if not made within prescribed period.

7 Aug 2019

The applicant, Schokhi Industrials Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award in Maritime Demurrage Dispute — Claim Time-Barred Under Charterparty Clause 24. The court upheld the majority arbitrators' finding that the demurrage claim was received beyond the 45-day period stipulated in clause 24 of the Tanker Voyage Charterparty, and thus the claim was time-barred.

4 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Axios Navigation Co. Ltd., a shipowner, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tr...

46 47 48 49 50

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)