Search Results for "agreement holder"

2044 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2044 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Delhi High Court’s Unconditional Stay of Money Decree Under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC. Execution of Trademark Infringement Money Decree Stayed Without Deposit Pending Appeal, Upheld by Apex Court Citing Sufficient Cause.

The dispute arose from a civil suit instituted by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and anor, claiming to be the proprietor of the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was of the essence in the agreement for sale dated 25.04.2007, and the plaintiff did not demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 25.04.2007 between the plaintiff (appellant) and the defendant (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court heard cross-appeals from NCLAT order partly reversing NCLT’s finding on trademark ownership during CIRP; cross-appeal challenged NCLT’s jurisdiction to determine title under Section 60(5) IBC.

The dispute originated in the corporate insolvency resolution process of Fort Gloster Industries Limited (corporate debtor), which was admitted into C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction — Orders Passed Without Deciding Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Are Illegal. Trial Court Must First Decide Preliminary Issue of Jurisdiction Before Proceeding with Interim Applications.

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated 13.04.2017 and 17.07.2017 passed by the X...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Megha Lok Adalat Decree in Property Suit — Petitioner Not a Party to Compromise. Decree Passed Without Jurisdiction as Dispute Was Not Referable to Lok Adalat Under Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioner, Kishore Baldev Bajaj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a decree dated 25...