KAHC010645132024_1
19 Dec 2025The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...
Search Results for "acquiring bank"
590 result(s) found
Found 590 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.
8 Dec 2016The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Conflicting Divisions on Whether Under Section 9A of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act Time Limit for Caste Validity Certificate is Directory or Mandatory. The Reference Arises from a Writ Petition Challenging Automatic Termination of a Councillor's Election for Non-Production of Caste Validity Certificate Within Six Months.
9 Dec 2016The reference arose out of a writ petition challenging the election of a councillor from a reserved ward for Other Backward Classes (OBC) women in Bho...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.
7 Sep 2016This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...
- 25
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Promotions of Assistant Professors at Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth; Petitioners Seek Quashing of Orders and Reinstatement. The Petitioners, Members of Academic Staff, Contended That Promotions Were Governed by the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeths) Act, 1983 and the Corresponding Statutes of 1990.
11 Jun 2015Background: The petitioners, who are members of the academic staff of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, filed multiple writ petit...
- 26
High Court
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003
21 Nov 2006The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Revision Order in FCCB Capital Gains Case; Cost of Acquisition Dispute Between FCCB Scheme and Section 49(2A) of Income-tax Act Examined. Revenue Relied on Section 49(2A) While Petitioner Invoked Clause 7(4) of the 1993 Scheme.
27 Mar 2019The writ petition under Article 226 was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Inco...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Regularize Building Irregularities under MRTP Act. The Court examined the validity of orders passed under Sections 45 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, concerning unauthorized construction and occupation certificate refusal.
11 Jun 2012The matter involved writ petitions challenging the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited's (CIDCO) rejection of a regular...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeals Against Reference Court's Compensation Award in Land Acquisition Cases. Enhancement of Compensation for Irrigated Agricultural Lands Based on Comparable Sale Instances under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
11 Jan 2010The judgment arose from a group of first appeals filed by land owners challenging the compensation awarded by the Reference Court for agricultural lan...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
30 Jul 2024The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...
- 451
