Search Results for "Stay Pending Appeal"

3273 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3273 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit — Arbitration Award Not Binding on Third Party Purchaser. The Court held that an arbitration award does not operate as res judicata against a party who was not a party to the arbitration and who purchased the property in a court auction.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession and mesne profits in respect of a three-storey commercial-cum-residential building situated at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 443 OF 2012

The matter arises out of Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, filed by Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd. against Jignesh Shah, Aruna Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act for Delayed Payment. Court Analyses Effect of Interim Stay on Demand Date Under Section 31(4).

The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging demand n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Revenue's Wealth Tax Appeals Involving Definition of 'Assets'. The Appeals Challenge ITAT Orders Regarding Assessment Years 1999-2000 to 2004-05 under Section 2(ea) of Wealth Tax Act, 1957.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of Wealth Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 27-A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Respondents in Suo Motu Criminal Contempt for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Court Orders. Court holds that mere breach of undertaking does not constitute criminal contempt unless it scandalizes or lowers authority of court.

The High Court of Bombay initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against respondent no.1 (M.N. Navale, President of Sinhgad Technical Educati...