Search Results for "Section 363"

874 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 874 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Based on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Unilateral Appointment Does Not Violate Section 12(5) Read with Seventh Schedule When Arbitrator Not Disqualified and Objection Waived by Participation.

The petitioners, Hanuman Motors Pvt. Ltd. and another, challenged an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator appointed by the respondent, M/s. Tata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Minor Daughter Kidnapped by Accused, Directs Police to Produce Victim and Hand Over Custody to Father. Writ of Habeas Corpus Maintainable for Production of Minor Child Illegally Detained Under Section 363 IPC.

The petitioner, Junned Ahmed Mujib Khan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus for production of his minor daughter, Khaleda ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Atrocity Case on Ground of Parity with Co-Accused. Appellant, who was in custody for 4-5 years and had no overt act of setting deceased on fire, granted bail under Sections 302, 307, 341, 363 IPC read with SC/ST Act.

The appellant, Dinesh Laxman Chavan, was an accused in Special Atrocity Sessions Case No. 19 of 2015 before the learned Special Judge, Pune, for offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Allotment After 13 Years — Delay Unreasonable Despite No Limitation Prescribed Under UPZALR Act. Allottees Who Constructed Houses and Resided for 13 Years Have Legitimate Expectation; Suo Moto Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Period.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had upheld the cancellation of land allotment to the appel...