Search Results for "Section 13(2) notice"

1202 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1202 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons Under Section 319 CrPC Against Witnesses in Murder Trial — No Prima Facie Case for Additional Accused. Summons Issued Without Proper Application of Mind as Evidence Did Not Satisfy Test of Strong Suspicion Under Section 319 CrPC.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions filed under Sections 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Appointment of Arbitrator for Partnership Dispute. Court finds existence of arbitration clause in partnership deed and refers parties to arbitration despite dispute over dissolution.

The applicant, Mr. Palwinder Singh Samra, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blanket Prohibitory Order Under Section 144 CrPC in Bengaluru, Holds It Violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b); Order Cancelling Protest Permissions Against CAA Struck Down as District Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Provide Material Facts.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 18 December 2019 issued by the District Magistrate-cum-Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...