Search Results for "Dominant Purpose"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Dominant Purpose"

548 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 548 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal in Interior Decorator Case — Professionals and Consultants Engaged by Interior Decorator Firm Held Not Employees Under ESI Act. The Court held that professionals and consultants engaged by an interior decorator firm are not employees under Section 2(9) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, as they are not under the control and supervision of the employer.

22 Feb 2005

The Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation appealed against an order of the Judge, Employees' Insurance Court, Bombay dated 30th Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Workmen Held Not Employees of Respondent. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that the 21 persons named in the complaint were not employees of the respondent, as the respondent had ceased business and the workmen were employed by third parties.

5 Jul 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra General Kamgar Mahasangh, a trade union, filed a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Preventio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Educational Institution's Challenge, Holds Teachers Are Employees Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Teachers of private aided colleges are entitled to gratuity as 'employees' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, rejecting the contention that teachers are not covered by the Act.

7 Jun 2006

The case involves three writ petitions filed by educational institutions (Seth Govindraoji Ayurved Mahavidyalaya and Seth Sakharam Premchand Jain Aush...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Against Disqualification for Non-Compliance with Caste Certificate Validity Order. Disqualification under Section 10(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 set aside as the order requiring production of caste validity certificate was passed without jurisdiction.

5 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Sau. Pramila Tayde, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Ner, in Akola district. She was aggrieved by an order dated 7th April 2011 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Domestic Violence Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Marriage Solemnized and Incident Occurred in Gujarat, Not Maharashtra. Section 27 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Requires Proceedings in Court Where Victim Resides or Incident Occurs.

18 Dec 2025

The petitioner, an Indian citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Nov 2025

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR and Charge Sheet in SC/ST Atrocities Case for Lack of Intent to Humiliate in Public View. Allegations of Caste-Based Abuse and Assault Failed to Disclose Essential Ingredients Under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

17 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Sri Shailesh Kumar V., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashment of FIR N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Benami Transaction Not Proved. Suit for declaration and possession decreed as plaintiff established title through sale deed and possession, while defendant failed to prove that property was purchased benami in plaintiff's name.

31 Mar 2023

The appellant-defendant Mahadev filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the concurrent judgment...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Legal Representatives to Continue Appeal Under Section 166(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166(5) Held Retrospective, Applies to Pending Appeals Where Claimant Died Before Amendment.

20 Jul 2022

The case involves two appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 07.03.2011 in MVC Nos.19...

46 47 48 49 50

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)