Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Matter — Assessment of Compensation and Allied Issues. Dispute Involves Quantum of Compensation and Locus Standi of Acquiring Body Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Jan 2026...
Search Results for "Corrigendum"
482 result(s) found
Found 482 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Customs Appeals on Domestic Clearance of Duty-Free Input Products Under Advance Authorizations. Core Issue Whether Tribunal Correctly Interpreted Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 Paras 4.1.3 and 4.1.5 to Permit Domestic Sales Before Export Obligation Fulfillment.
27 Oct 2016The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of 17 customs appeals filed by various companies and individuals against three Commissioners of C...
- 25
High Court
High Court Considers Maintainability and Exemption Issue in Writ Petition Against Tax Demand on Alleged Non-Export Sale. Interprets Section 5(3) of CST Act Regarding Penultimate Sale Deemed Export.
4 Aug 2014The petitioner, a manufacturer of submarine navy batteries, challenged orders demanding sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 on the ground t...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Educational Society Challenging Transfer of Secondary School to Same Village. Court Holds That Existing Institution Has No Locus Standi to Object to Transfer, and No Violation of Natural Justice.
22 Jan 2014Background: The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Public Education Society, a trust managing a secondary school in village Walwadi, Dhule di...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Commercial Arbitration Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award on Royalty Liability for Earthwork. Liability for Royalty on Ordinary Earth Used in Embankment Held by Arbitral Tribunal to be Borne by Employer, Section 34 Petition Filed Challenging Interpretation of Contract Clauses.
14 Nov 2025The matter involved a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to a majority arbitral award dated 22nd May 2020 arisin...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Customs Duty on Non-Delivered Goods. Importer's Refund Claim Rejected by Customs Authority Due to Inter-Departmental Dispute over Liability, Sections 13, 23, 27A of Customs Act, 1962 Involved.
19 Nov 2025The petitioner, a company manufacturing PVC/CPVC pipes, imported 100 metric tons of Polyvinyl Chloride Resin SG-5 Erdos. It filed Bill of Entry No. 84...
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Considers Multiple Writ Petitions Against Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank's Securitisation Action Over Sugar Factory Assets. The Core Legal Question is Whether a Co-operative Bank Qualifies as a 'Bank' Under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, and the Validity of Measures Taken Under Section 13(4) Thereof.
19 Dec 2006The matter arose from multiple writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) concerning the assets of Shankar Sahakari Sakhar K...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Seniority List Revision. B.P.Ed. Teachers Not Entitled to Count Seniority Before Government Resolution of 25.11.1988.
20 Nov 2006Background: A group of writ petitions was filed by Headmasters, a Supervisor, and Assistant Teachers of schools run by Maratha Shikshan Sanstha, who h...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals - Upholds Single Judge's Reversal of Disqualification of Councillors under Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act. The Court held that the whip was not validly issued as there was no authorization from the municipal party under the Act and Rules.
23 Aug 2013The appeals arose from a disqualification proceeding under the Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986. The appellant, Gajanan...
- 10
High Court
High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.
1 Jun 2019The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...
- 25
