Search Results for "stay discretionary power"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "stay discretionary power"

641 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 641 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order; Upholds Rent Controller's Jurisdiction Despite Absence of Written Lease Under Goa Rent Control Act, 1968. The Court Holds Section 34 of the Act to be Directory, Not Mandatory, and Refuses to Interfere with Concurrent Findings of Fact That the Tenant's Denial of Title Was Not Bonafide.

1 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Abdul Sattar Kulli, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, challenging th...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005

30 Nov 2005

The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Passport Renewal for Accused in Criminal Cases — Directs Issuance Without Impounding Subject to Conditions. Mere pendency of criminal proceedings does not justify denial of passport renewal under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967, and the Passport Authority must consider the request independently, subject to conditions to secure the petitioner's presence during trial.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by individuals who were denied renewal of their passports by the Passport Authority on the gro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by MSETCL — Holds Termination Without Show Cause Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Contractual Stipulations. The court set aside the termination order and directed restoration of status quo ante, emphasizing that contractual clauses requiring show cause notice must be adhered to.

10 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Maha Active Engineers India Pvt. Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondents, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.

21 Jan 2013

The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Directors of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Under Section 8 of Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 — No Prior Hearing Required for Removal in Public Interest. The court held that the power of removal under Section 8 is a statutory power exercised in public interest and does not require a prior hearing or recording of reasons.

8 May 2015

The petitioners were Directors of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), a corporation established under the Road Transport Corpora...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Normalization Process in Police Recruitment — Equi-Percentile Method Valid for Multi-Session Exams. Standardized Equi-Percentile Method for Normalization of Marks Across Different Sessions of Written Examination Held Permissible Under Uttar Pradesh Sub Inspector and Inspector (Police) Service Rules, 2015.

7 Jan 2022

The case pertains to the recruitment process for 2400 posts of Sub-Inspector of Police, 210 posts of Platoon Commander (PAC), and 97 posts of Fire Off...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)