NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
Search Results for "single point tax"
1532 result(s) found
Found 1532 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Reconsiders Refusal to Grant Letters of Administration in Mother's Will Dispute. Single Judge Found Suspicious Circumstances; Division Bench Earlier Allowed Appeal but Supreme Court Remanded for Fresh Adjudication.
30 Dec 2025This matter involves a testamentary suit where the appellant, Myra Philomena Collaco, sought Letters of Administration with the Will dated 7 July 1982...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals by Market Committee in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with Statutory Provisions.
25 Feb 2025The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the Special Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee for Fruits and Vegetables (the appellant) agai...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.
4 Mar 2015The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds IPAB Order Expunging Trademark 'Creative' for Deceptive Similarity in Travel Services. Petitioner's mark 'Creative Tours & Travels' held deceptively similar to respondent's registered mark 'Creative Travel', causing confusion among consumers under Section 9(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
4 May 2016The petitioner, Creative Tours & Travels (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Commercial Suit — Appellant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. The court held that the appellant's failure to appear despite service and the lack of a valid explanation for the delay in filing the application to set aside the decree disentitled it to relief under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
27 Nov 2020The appellant, BVM Finance Private Limited, was the original defendant No.1 in a commercial suit filed by the respondent No.1, Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.
30 Jul 2013The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...
- 147
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular First Appeal, Dismisses Suit for Cancellation of Partition Deed Due to Failure to Prove Duress. Power of Attorney Holder Cannot Testify on Party's State of Mind; Adverse Inference Drawn Against Plaintiff for Non-Examination.
5 Mar 2020The litigation arose out of a suit filed by the father against his daughter-in-law seeking cancellation of a partition deed and perpetual injunction. ...
- 21
High Court
High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Modvat Credit Dispute — Capital Goods Credit Denial Set Aside. Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 interpreted to allow credit on capital goods used in manufacture of final products, even if not directly used in the manufacturing process.
22 Aug 2017The appellant, M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of various chemical products at its Hazira Manufacturing Complex. The comp...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Deliberates on Applicability of Limitation Act to Appeals Before Collector Under Section 137 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Issue Centered on Whether Collector is a 'Court' for the Purpose of Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.
21 Dec 2006The writ petition arose from a demand notice dated 23 June 2003 issued to the petitioner, proprietress of Vishal Liquors, an ex-CLII licensee, for an ...
- 23
