Search Results for "search and seizure before FIR"

594 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 594 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Government Engineer in Lokayukta Case — Source Information Report Lacks Credible Material. Court holds that mere source information without verification cannot justify registration of crime under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department and currently functioning as Assistant Director of Town Planning, Yelah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Convicts in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Procedural Violations in Search and Seizure Lead to Acquittal of Appellants Convicted Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act.

The appellants, Pratap Bhimsingh Parera, Gangadhar Babaji Lenaka, Mrs. Savita Pratap Parera, and Mrs. Santoshi Santosh Pradhan, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Cab Driver Murder Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC.

The case involves four appellants convicted for the murder of a cab driver during a robbery. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial eviden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Failure to Join Independent Panch Witnesses and Inconsistencies in Seizure and Recovery Cast Doubt on Prosecution Case Under Sections 489B and 489C IPC.

The appellant, Shaikh Nazir Shaikh Failu, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 489B and 489C of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Brother Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive, last seen theory, and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shyam Vishnu Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad on 06.01.2017 for the murder of his brother Namdeo under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Officer for Corruption and Fabrication of Evidence. Disciplinary Proceedings Valid Despite Minor Procedural Irregularities.

The appellant, Pravin Kumar, was a Sub-Inspector in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) posted at the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambadas s/o Ramaji Sahare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha in Special Case No.3/1996 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Bhandara, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2013 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Culpable Homicide Case — Right of Private Defence Established. Appellant's firing held justified as he acted in self-defence and in discharge of duty to rescue an auto-rickshaw driver from assault.

The appellant, Abhang Ramu Holkar, a police constable attached to MIDC Police Station, was convicted under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Cod...