Search Results for "oral evidence exclusion"

782 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 782 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Plaintiff's Possession Based on Tenancy Rights and Adverse Possession. Letters Patent Appeal against dismissal of first appeal fails as defendants failed to prove title or better right to suit premises.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the original defendants against the dismissal of their first appeal from a decree in a suit for per...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Joint Family Property and His Possession.

The appellant, Champa Poojari, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals, Remands Case for Fresh Assessment, Clarifies Taxability of Unauthorised Structures and Reassessment of Land. Unauthorised Structures Held Liable to Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, While Land Already Assessed Cannot Be Reassessed.

The four first appeals before the Bombay High Court arose out of orders passed by the Small Causes Court in municipal appeals concerning the fixation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Appeal in Murder Case Due to Procedural Irregularity in Mental Fitness Inquiry. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as trial proceeded without proper inquiry into appellant's unsoundness of mind under Section 328 CrPC.

The appellant, Maria @ Mariano Borges, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, for the murder of his father Francisco Borges on 16.02....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Arbitration Petitions Challenging Award on Family Settlement MOU — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Interpretation of MOU Clauses but Sets Aside Award on Certain Claims as Beyond Scope of Reference.

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a sole arbitrator's awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disciplinary Penalty Against Executive Engineer for Negligence in Rate Justification. Reduction in pay by one stage for one year with cumulative effect confirmed as proportionate penalty under Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965.

The petitioner, Shri B.M. Mittal, an Executive Engineer, challenged the judgment and order dated 30.9.2004 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land in Malad. Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Seeks Higher Compensation Than Awarded by SLAO.

These proceedings arose from the acquisition of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The acquired property comprised land bearing Survey No. 91 ...