ARBITRATION PETITION NO.891 OF 2010
8 Jan 2016The case arises from arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards. The peti...
Search Results for "initial appointment date"
1562 result(s) found
Found 1562 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Termination of Probationer Without Inquiry. Automatic Termination Clause in Appointment Letter Held Invalid as Termination Was Stigmatic and Required Domestic Inquiry Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
1 Oct 2015The petitioner, WIKA Instruments India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgment and award of the Labour Court dated 14 November 2011, which held that the te...
- 154
High Court
Full Bench of the Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Interpretation of Clauses 96 and 97 of MCGM General Conditions of Contract. The Court Examines Whether Compliance with Clause 96 is a Precondition for Invoking Arbitration under Clause 97.
8 Feb 2017The appeal arose from an arbitration petition concerning a contractual dispute between a contractor and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (M...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Unilateral Price Hike in Flat Purchase Agreement. The court restrained the builder from selling the flat to third parties and from increasing the price, pending suit for specific performance.
12 Aug 2015The plaintiff, Pius Varghese Pullikottil and another, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for the purchase of a flat against Neptune...
- 98
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in University Lecturer Appointment Case - Quashes Chancellor's Order Rejecting Selection Committee Recommendation. Chancellor's order found unsustainable due to exceeding scope of remand, absence of specific qualifications in statutes, and violation of natural justice under U.P. State Universities Act, 1973.
24 Mar 2022The dispute arose from the appellant's challenge to the dismissal of his writ petition seeking to quash the Chancellor's order rejecting his appointme...
- 255
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order Denying Age Relaxation to Contract Employee. Petitioner Failed to Establish Legitimate Expectation for Age Relaxation Beyond Recruitment Rules for Field Investigator Post.
26 Oct 2018The petitioner, Dheeru Nayak, was initially appointed as a Field Investigator on contract basis in the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) unde...
- 122
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CAT Order on Pay Fixation for Regularized Employees. Court holds that last pay drawn before regularization must be protected and seniority must be counted from initial appointment as casual labourers.
6 Feb 2026The petitioners, who were initially appointed as casual labourers in the Department of Posts, were regularized after several years. They filed Origina...
- 65
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Inter Se Seniority Dispute Among Teachers Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 — Seniority Determined by Date of Entry into Category Based on Qualifications
4 Jan 2019The dispute in this appeal pertains to the inter se seniority of the appellant and the 5th respondent, both appointed as Assistant Teachers in a secon...
- 224
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Government Resolution Requiring Teachers to Reside Within Municipal Corporation Limits for Eligibility to Transfer. The Court held that the condition of residence within the municipal corporation area for transfer eligibility under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 and the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 is ultra vires the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and the Maharashtra Right to Public Services Act, 2015.
24 Feb 2023The petitioners, teachers employed in private aided schools in Pune, challenged a Government Resolution dated 30th April 2019 issued by the School Edu...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.
12 Mar 2019The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...
- 19
