Search Results for "inadmissible statements"

636 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 636 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand Soon Before Death. State fails to prove that deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demand shortly before suicide.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur, acquitting the respondents (accused) of offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal, Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Child Murder Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen, disclosure statement, and recovery of body held sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of a 10-year-old girl named Soru Kharia (also known as Haru Kharia), who was adopted by Smt. Sumitra Panika, the mothe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302, 397 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard two criminal appeals filed by accused Nos. 3 and 2 (Mahammad Shariff and Hrushikesh @ Shastri) challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Fact. The Court held that no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC as the findings of the courts below were based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Revision Order, Holding Interlocutory Order on Cross-Examination Not a 'Case Decided' Under CPC 115. High Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Interfere in Trial Court's Refusal to Try Preliminary Issues.

The dispute arose out of agreements relating to the exhibition of cinematograph films in a cinema building in Ahmedabad. R and F, who held the buildin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010300082015_1

The appeal arose from the conviction of two public servants employed in the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) for demanding and accept...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case as Medical Evidence Fails to Conclusively Prove Homicidal Death. Circumstantial Evidence Chain Broken Where Doctor Could Not Rule Out Suicide or Accident, Giving Benefit of Doubt under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ganesh Balbhim Kshirsagar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga, under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for the murder of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...