Search Results for "compensation rehabilitation"

969 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 969 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 326 IPC for Acid Attack but Enhances Victim Compensation — State Appeals Against Reduction of Sentence from Section 307 IPC Dismissed

The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed against the judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh which altered the conviction of the respondents from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Failure to Pay Compensation Violates Article 300A. Petitioners' land acquired for Upper Krishna Project; compensation not paid despite notice under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, owners of Plot No.1 in RS. No.18/B situated at Bagalkot, Ward No.11, Gaddankeri, Bagalkot taluk, filed a writ petition under Articles...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Review Petition Due to Unexplained Delay of 1679 Days. Condonation of Delay Denied as Limitation Expired Before COVID-19 Pandemic and No Sufficient Cause Shown.

The State of Maharashtra and others filed a Review Petition (Stamp) No. 19950 of 2022 seeking review of a judgment dated 15 November 2017 in Writ Peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Panshet Dam Rehabilitation — Land Acquisition Act Prevails Over Resettlement Act in Absence of Notification Under Section 11(1) of Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act, 1976.

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased Sahebrao Gulabrao Dhamale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Resettlement Project Due to Unexplained Delay of 12 Years. Petitioners' challenge to 2006 order of Divisional Commissioner fails as they failed to demonstrate diligence after personal hearing in 2005.

The petitioners, four individuals who are grandchildren of the original landowner Babasaheb Khadirsaheb Pirjade, filed a writ petition in 2018 challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Chief Settlement Commissioner's Order Cancelling Allotment of Land Due to Absence of Finding of Fraud. Mandatory Condition under Section 24(2) of Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 Not Satisfied.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by Estates Development Ltd. against the Union of India and others, concerning the cancellation of an allotment of ...