Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

3620 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3620 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit — Appellants' Possessory Title Upheld Over Respondents' Claim of Redemption. Court holds that a mortgagee in possession acquires title by adverse possession after 12 years from the date of mortgage if the mortgagor fails to redeem within the limitation period under Article 61 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

14 Oct 2005

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a suit for redemption of mortgage and possession filed by the respondents ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Court Orders in Property Dispute Between Member and Housing Society. Member's claim for plot allotment fails as cancellation by NIT and subsequent sale to third party upheld due to member's failure to construct within stipulated time.

23 Apr 2010

The petitioner, a member of the respondent Nagpur Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., was allotted plot No.122 by the Society, which had obtained 13 plo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Two Regular First Appeals Against Common Decree for Specific Performance of Agreements of Sale of Immovable Property. The Appellants Contended That the Agreements Were Sham and Without Consideration, While the Respondents Claimed Breach of the Right of Pre-emption Under a Lease Deed.

3 Feb 2023

The appeals before the High Court of Karnataka arose from two suits (O.S. No. 6281/1994 and O.S. No. 4361/1997) filed for specific performance of two ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Family Settlement Dispute. Court grants status quo order to protect assets pending arbitration under family settlement agreement.

22 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Mukesh J. Shah, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim relief pe...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Berth Reservation Dispute. Court Examines Whether the Claim Was Barred by Limitation and Whether the Award Was Patently Illegal Under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The judgment of the Madras High Court in OSA (CAD) No. 39 of 2021 involved an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a...

High Court

High Court Hears Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Against Awards Passed Under Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act in Loan Recovery Matter. Bank's Claim for Defaulted Loan Allowed by Arbitrator After Cooperative Court Returned Plaint for Want of Jurisdiction Following Conversion to Multi-State Bank.

2 Apr 2013

The judgment (or portion thereof) involves four arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that the plaint discloses a cause of action and the suit is not barred by limitation, as the agreement to sell was executed in 2016 and the suit was filed in 2021 within the period of limitation.

4 Jul 2023

The petitioners, who were defendants No.5 and 6 in the original suit, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC as Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence and Held Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Joint Family Property.

4 Sep 2015

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in a partition suit, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeals Under Section 100 CPC Arising from Property Disputes. Appeals Challenged First Appellate Court Judgments Setting Aside Trial Court Decrees in O.S. No. 674/1992 and Connected Matters.

19 Dec 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute Over Sale Deed Validity — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court Held That No Substantial Question of Law Arises When Findings Are Based on Appreciation of Evidence and Are Not Perverse.

5 May 2014

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute. The appellants, Rambhau Maroti Fating and others, and M/s L.G. Developers & Buil...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)