Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeals Under Section 100 CPC Arising from Property Disputes. Appeals Challenged First Appellate Court Judgments Setting Aside Trial Court Decrees in O.S. No. 674/1992 and Connected Matters.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-11-06 19:34:55
  • 110
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010313002006_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (12) 43

R.S.A. No. 1787 of 2006 c/w R.S.A. Nos. 1788 of 2006, 1789 of 2006 & 1791 of 2006

2019-12-19

Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar

Sri. M.R. Rajagopal for Sri. S.N. Bhat for Appellants; Sri. K. Raghavendra Rao for Respondents

Smt. Bhadrunnisa and Others in R.S.A. No. 1787/2006; K. Abdul Rahim (since deceased by LRs) in R.S.A. Nos. 1788, 1789, 1791/2006

Khasim Sab S/O Khadar Sab and Others (including Usman Sab since deceased by LRs and others)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Regular Second Appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against judgments and decrees of the first appellate court.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the first appellate court's judgments and decrees and restoration of the trial court's decrees.

Filing Reason

Aggrieved by the first appellate court allowing the regular appeals and setting aside the trial court's decrees.

Previous Decisions

Trial court (II Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Bhadravathi) decreed the suits on 30.03.2005. First appellate court (Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) & JMFC, Bhadravathi) allowed the regular appeals (R.A. Nos. 27/2005, 29/2005, etc.) on 18.03.2006, setting aside the trial court decrees.

Procedural History

Suits O.S. No. 674/1992 and connected matters were decreed by the II Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Bhadravathi on 30.03.2005. Regular Appeals R.A. No. 27/2005 and connected matters were allowed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) & JMFC, Bhadravathi on 18.03.2006, setting aside the trial court decrees. Aggrieved, the appellants filed Regular Second Appeals under Section 100 CPC before the High Court of Karnataka, which were heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 100
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Regular Second Appeal Section 100 CPC Reversal of Decree First Appellate Court Trial Court Decree

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement and Passing Off Claims Over Web Series Title 'Singardaan' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiff's Short Story and Defendants' Web Series. 2026-11-07 01:59:46
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Appeal to Jammu High Court Due to Related Proceedings. Transfer justified to facilitate the adjudication of interconnected legal matters under Section 498A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 2026-11-07 01:59:43
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition murder acquittal natural justice compensation burden of proof land acquisition jurisdiction limitation circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Teacher Appointment Approval. ...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitration Awards in Trading Dispute Due to Te...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Revisits Disqualification Laws in Panchayat Elections — Acknowledges Chang...

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court's Order on Pension Deduction. Regul...

Supreme Court Addresses Legislative Competence on Taxation of Goods — Key Constitutional...

Lost Your Password?