Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1515 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1515 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Appellant in Arbitration Enforcement Dispute — Objections Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Held Time-Barred Despite COVID-19 Extension Orders. Court rules that the suo motu extension of limitation by the Supreme Court during COVID-19 did not apply to the period for filing objections under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the limitation is prescribed under the Arbitration Act itself.

26 Aug 2022

The case involves appeals by Walter Bau AG, a German company, against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) concerning the enforcement of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows NHAI's Appeal in Arbitration Delay Condonation Case — Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended Beyond 120 Days. The Court held that the proviso to Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is a complete code and the maximum period for filing a Section 34 application is 120 days from the date of receipt of the award or order, and no court has the power to condone delay beyond that period.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which ha...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award on Price Adjustment Claim. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and interpreting contract clauses under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitral award was based on material evidence and not patently illegal.

2 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a contract dated 09.07.2018 between the appellant, a contractor, and the respondent, the Deputy Commissioner of Dharwad Distric...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute Between L&T and HPCL — Court Sets Aside Award on Claims for Extra Work and Interest, Upholds Claims for Refund of Liquidated Damages and Escalation. The court restored the arbitrator's award on refund of liquidated damages and escalation, holding that the Single Judge exceeded the limited scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Sep 2016

The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows ICICI Bank's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitral Award on Claims for Loss of Profit and Interest on Mobilization Advance. The court held that the arbitrator cannot award interest on an interest-free mobilization advance and cannot award loss of profit without evidence of actual loss.

30 Mar 2016

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Jurisdictional Challenge in Admiralty Suit Filed Without Vessel in Territorial Waters. Suit Held Maintainable When Arrest Warrant Executed upon Vessel's Subsequent Arrival, Following Geetanjali Woolen Precedent.

12 Jul 2011

The case involves an admiralty suit in rem filed by Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Limited, a Hong Kong company, against the vessel M...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Notice of Motion for Reference to Arbitration in Dispute Between Commodity Spot Exchange and Member. Defendant Exchange Seeks to Rely on Bye-Laws and Undertaking as Arbitration Agreement Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Sep 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Arbitral Award Passed Outside State — Stamp Duty Payable Only Where Award is Made Under Section 3 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. Arbitral Award Made in Mumbai Not Subject to Karnataka Stamp Duty When Sought to be Executed in Karnataka.

23 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd, a financial institution, entered into a loan agreement with respondents No. 1 and 2. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commercial Appeal Against Refusal to Amend Arbitration Petition — Amendment Sought to Challenge Arbitral Award as Nullity Rejected as Time-Barred and Without Merit. The Court held that an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable against an order refusing amendment of a petition, and the amendment was rightly rejected as it was sought after the limitation period had expired.

7 Apr 2017

The case involves a Commercial Appeal filed by Zee Sports Ltd. (now Zee Digital Convergance Ltd.) against Nimbus Media Pte. Ltd. under Section 37 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Broker Dispute — MOU Default Renders Agreement Void and Claimant Entitled to Recover Full Amount. The court upheld the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

24 Mar 2015

The petitioner, a share and stock broker and member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, was the original respondent in arbitration proceedings initiated by ...

45 46 47 48 49

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)