High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "Stay Pending Appeal"
3267 result(s) found
Found 3267 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Transaction; Appellate Court's Reversal of Finding on Nature of Transaction Was Justified.
8 Jun 2018The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...
- 108
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Taking Cognizance Against Additional Advocate General in Private Complaint for Offences Under SC/ST Act and IPC — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 of PC Act
26 Jun 2013The petitioner, Sri K M Nataraj, the Additional Advocate General of Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...
- 60
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in Land Acquisition Case Due to Exclusion of Stay Period Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Not Deemed Lapsed as Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Operative Stay Order, Excluding Period from Five-Year Computation per Indore Development Authority Precedent.
13 Mar 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring the acquisition deemed to have lapsed ...
- 256
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Odisha Forest Development Corporation Ltd. in Tender Dispute — Refund of Deposit Ordered by High Court Set Aside. Forfeiture of Security Deposit Upheld as Per Contract Terms When Writ Petition Withdrawn Without Pressing Challenge.
6 Dec 2019The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the High Court of Orissa. The appellant, Odisha Forest Development Corporat...
- 287
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 28-A Application for Enhanced Compensation Based on High Court's Appellate Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land owners covered by same notification can seek parity under Section 28-A even if reference court refused enhancement.
13 Jul 2023The petitioners, legal heirs of original land owners Shankarrao Pandoji Shendge and Bhagwan Pandoji Shendge, owned agricultural land in Mouza Ansing, ...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition as Infructuous in Arbitration Award Enforcement Dispute — Pending Section 34 Challenge Renders Interim Relief Unnecessary. Court holds that an arbitral award is not enforceable under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 while a Section 34 petition to set aside the award is pending, and thus a Section 9 petition for stay of the award is infructuous.
10 Mar 2011The petitioner, Reliance Securities Limited, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a sta...
- 81
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit — Arbitration Award Not Binding on Third Party Purchaser. The Court held that an arbitration award does not operate as res judicata against a party who was not a party to the arbitration and who purchased the property in a court auction.
29 May 2026The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession and mesne profits in respect of a three-storey commercial-cum-residential building situated at...
- 103
High Court
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 443 OF 2012
27 Jun 2013The matter arises out of Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, filed by Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd. against Jignesh Shah, Aruna Sh...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.
27 Jun 2013The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...
- 56
