WRIT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2004
9 Aug 2010The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by international airlines—Malaysian Airlines, Saudi Arabian Airlines, North West Airlines, and Ke...
Search Results for "statutory deposit"
3303 result(s) found
Found 3303 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Review Applications in Land Acquisition Cases Based on Overruled Precedent. Court held review maintainable under Article 137 of Constitution of India as subsequent Constitution Bench decision in Indore Development Authority overruled earlier Pune Municipal Corporation decision, altering law and providing sufficient reason for review, with matters restored for fresh consideration on merits.
17 Mar 2023The Supreme Court dealt with a group of review applications filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and Delhi Development Authority under Article 137 ...
- 406
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Waiving Predeposit for Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Mandatory Deposit Under Section 18 Cannot Be Waived Even by High Court Under Article 226.
2 Mar 2020The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Bombay High Court's order dated 25.11.2019 and 16.12.2019, which had relegated the appellant (Union B...
- 228
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
5 Jun 2023The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.
4 Sep 2023The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrary Cancellation of Tender Award. State Warehousing Corporation's Cancellation of Contract Without Reasons or Hearing Held Unreasonable.
17 Jun 2022The petitioner, M/s Bhagwati Builders, a proprietary concern of Vijay Agrawal, participated in a tender issued by Respondent No.1, Maharashtra State W...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award in Irrigation Project — No Arbitrariness Found in Relaxation of Eligibility Criteria. Court held that tender conditions are not statutory and can be relaxed if not essential, and that the petitioner failed to establish mala fides or arbitrariness.
25 Apr 2011The petitioner, Kailash Constructions, challenged the award of a tender by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) to respondent no. 5,...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Remand Order in Co-operative Society Dispute, Directs Fresh Hearing on Merits. Appellate Authority Under Section 152 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Must Decide Appeal on Merits, Cannot Simply Remand.
4 May 2011The petitioners, members of respondent no.2, a specified co-operative society engaged in sugar manufacturing, challenged an order dated 18th January 2...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 — Bona Fide Defence of No Privity of Contract Rejected Based on Admission of Debt. The court held that an admission of debt by the Respondent, coupled with failure to reply to the Appellant's letter, negated the defence of no privity of contract.
2 Aug 2012The appeal arose from an order of the Learned Company Judge dated 11 February 2011 dismissing a Petition for winding up under Section 433(e) of the Co...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Render Award and Excessive Fees — Substitute Arbitrator Appointed Under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that failure to render award within reasonable time and demanding excessive fees constitute failure to act under Section 14(1)(a) of the Act.
16 Apr 2019The petitioner, Parekh Industries Limited, filed a petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking terminatio...
- 85
