Search Results for "settlement stay"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "settlement stay"

1132 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1132 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order to Try Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue in Contract Dispute. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in contract designating Mumbai courts does not automatically oust territorial jurisdiction of Aurangabad court without proper adjudication.

13 Dec 2022

The petitioner, M/s Ghai Construction, filed a suit (Spl. C. S. No. 276 of 2009) in the Civil Court at Aurangabad for recovery of Rs. 652.06 Lakhs fro...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Rejects Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court holds that a plaint cannot be rejected on the ground of non-joinder of necessary parties or lack of cause of action when the plaintiff seeks declaration of partnership rights and accounts.

25 Sep 2025

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Mrs. Bhagyashree Jain against M/s. Vyshnavi Visions and its partners, challenging the trial court's ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in NIFTY Trade Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that petitioners failed to prove unauthorized trade and that credit note was accepted without objection.

11 Feb 2010

The petitioners, Intex Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Mehta, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trade Union Dispute — No Interference with Industrial Court's Discretionary Order. The Court held that the Single Judge rightly declined to interfere under Article 227 of the Constitution as the Industrial Court's order granting interim relief under Section 28/2 of the Trade Union Act, 1926 was not perverse or without jurisdiction.

21 Apr 2011

The appellant, Niranjankumar Shah, General Secretary of Lal Zenda Coal Mines Majdoor Union (CITU), filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment ...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Employer in Industrial Dispute — Upholds Dismissal of Workman After Fair Domestic Enquiry. Labour Court's Interference Set Aside as Enquiry Was Proper and Punishment Not Disproportionate Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

7 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Chloride India Ltd. (now Exide Industries Ltd.), challenged the Award dated 19.9.1995 passed by the IInd Labour Court, Pune in Referen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reference Order in Industrial Dispute Over Contract Labour - Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship and Non-Application of Mind by Government. The court held that the government must prima facie satisfy itself about the existence of an employer-employee relationship before referring a dispute concerning contract labour under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

18 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Voltas Limited, challenged an order of reference dated 9 July 2012 made by the State of Maharashtra under Section 10(1) of the Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Debtor Company for Non-Payment of Decretal Debt. Decretal debt remains due and payable despite unsuccessful attempt to set aside ex-parte decree; no bona fide defence raised.

26 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Gati Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, Atcom Technologie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Dishonour Case — RTGS System Does Not Expand Concept of Drawee Bank. The court held that the drawee bank remains the branch on which the cheque is drawn, and the RTGS system does not alter territorial jurisdiction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

13 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Sangita wd/o Ajay Shah, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the territorial jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate, First...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Dishonour Case — RTGS System Does Not Expand Concept of Drawee Bank Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the drawee bank is the branch on which the cheque is drawn, and the RTGS system does not confer jurisdiction on courts where other branches dishonour the cheque.

13 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Sangita wd/o Ajay Shah, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the territorial jurisdiction of t...

44 45 46 47 48

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)