Search Results for "separate suit maintainability"

778 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 778 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Second Appeal in Part, Remands for Demarcation of Encroached Land. Dispute over ownership and encroachment of land survey no. 34/1 at Jaswantpura, Aurangabad, with conflicting claims between plaintiffs and CIDCO.

The case involves two second appeals by the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) against a common judgment of the appellate court. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Trial Court Decree for Declaration, Possession, and Mesne Profits. Vendor-Purchaser Dispute: Non-delivery of possession after sale deed execution leads to decree for possession and mesne profits.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by defendant Nos.1 and 2 (Kullappa and Muniyellappa) against the judgment and decree dated 11.04.2003 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Ceiling Act Case — Customary Divorce Not Proven, Civil Suit Barred. High Court Erred in Interfering with Concurrent Findings and Ignoring Bar of Jurisdiction Under Section 46 of Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh which allowed a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Dungaji, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Insurance Claim Dispute — Mandamus Issued for Reimbursement of Neonatal Treatment Expenses. Clause 3.11 of Mediclaim Policy Interpreted to Cover New-Born Babies from Birth, Not After 90 Days.

The petitioner, Rita Kirit Joshi, held two Mediclaim policies with New India Assurance Company (respondent no. 1) covering herself and her family. She...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment for Temple Construction — No Public Interest Violation Found. Court held that allotment of land for a temple under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code does not require public auction and is permissible for religious purposes.

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Bapu Shankar Dighe and Dadasaheb Kusabapu Pawar, challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Court holds that failure to pay costs as directed by the court results in dismissal of the appeal under Section 100 CPC.

The State of Karnataka and its officers filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Interim Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Prima Facie Finds Interim Award Passed Without Considering Entire Pleadings and Grants Stay of Enforcement.

The matter involved two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Challenging Execution of MSME Arbitral Award on Grounds of Fraud. Court Considers Whether Execution Proceedings Can Be Quashed When Award Was Not Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1996, Despite Participation in Arbitration.

The petitioner, Karnataka State Medical Supplies Corporation Limited, floated a tender for supply of drugs and disposable delivery kits. The responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when courts below have concurrently found that suit property is joint family property and plaintiff is entitled to share.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants No.2 to 4 against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Latur, in Regul...