Search Results for "partnership business"

1796 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1796 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Rule 106-B of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 Restricting Alcohol Content in Homoeopathic Medicines. The Court held that the rule is intra vires the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and not violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The Petitioner, Shrikrishna Homeo Pharmacy, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, carries on the business of manufactu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Execution Proceedings — Auction Sale Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order 21 Rule 95 CPC. Delivery of possession is a mandatory requirement for confirmation of sale under Order 21 Rule 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves two Regular First Appeals (RFA No. 557/2016 and RFA No. 558/2016) filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of the Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Condition in Housekeeping Contracts. Court holds that condition requiring prior hospital experience for housekeeping work is arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Mahalsa Services and Cam Industrial Services challenging a tender condition imposed by the State of Goa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Filed by Builder Challenging Sealing of Property Under Enemy Property Act, 1968. Court Examines Legality of Order Passed by Deputy Secretary and Custodian After Earlier Withdrawal of Enemy Property Proceedings.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged as builder and developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...