NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
Search Results for "civil suit limitation"
3620 result(s) found
Found 3620 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.
1 Jan 2020The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...
- 180
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Property Suit. Held that the plaint discloses a cause of action and is not barred by limitation or res judicata under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
13 Aug 2010The petitioner, Dr. Suresh Bhalchandra Shetye, was the original defendant no.1 in a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) seeking partit...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act, Condoning 258-Day Delay. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Partnership Disputes Arising from Deed of Alteration of Partnership Dated 10 April 2013.
7 Apr 2026The applicant, Infra Poonam Developers LLP, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an ...
- 195
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance of Contract in Property Sale Dispute. Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell house decreed as plaintiff proved readiness and willingness to perform her part of contract.
17 Nov 2014The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by original defendant No. 2, Venunath Sambha More, cha...
- 91
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.
1 Jun 2015The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Possession and Declaration of Title — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Specific Relief Act. The court held that the trial court erred in relying on extraneous material and that the plaint averments showed the suit was within limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
27 Jul 2022The appellant, Manu Babu Patel, original plaintiff no.1, along with respondent no.7 (original plaintiff no.2), filed a suit in the Civil Judge, Senior...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses First Appellate Court's Decree and Restores Trial Court's Dismissal. The Court held that the first appellate court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, and its judgment was perverse and not based on evidence.
16 Jul 2026The case involves a property dispute among siblings over ancestral property in Campal, Panaji, Goa. The original plaintiffs (respondents) filed a suit...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Order II Rule 2 CPC Bar Applicable for Successive Alienations. Two separate sale deeds by same vendor to same vendee on different dates constitute distinct causes of action, but suit for second alienation is barred if not included in earlier suit when cause of action was same.
10 May 2019The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the High Court's judgment that set aside the concurrent findings of the trial court and first appellate...
- 303
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Findings on Limitation in Eviction Suit. Court holds that a suit for possession filed within 12 years of the date when possession becomes adverse is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
20 Aug 2019The case involves a civil revision application filed by M/s. SGM Properties & Investments Pvt. Ltd. (the applicant/landlord) against Basantkumar Bilas...
- 67
