Search Results for "ascertained liability"

835 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 835 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement in Company Petition for Revival of Sick Pharmaceutical Company. Scheme under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956, Approved Involving Settlement of Secured Creditors' Dues through Cash and Securities.

The Pharmaceutical Products of India Limited (PPIL), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed two company petitions under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Addresses Challenge to Arbitral Award Granting Damages in Electricity Supply Contract Dispute. Tribunal's Award of Damages for Installed Objects Questioned on Grounds of Fundamental Breach Limited to Uninstalled Units Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.

The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in SEBI PFUTP Regulations Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Investigation Report. The Court Held That the Investigation Report Under Regulation 9 Must Be Disclosed to Ensure a Fair Hearing Under Principles of Natural Justice, as It Forms the Basis for the Show Cause Notice.

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by SEBI to the appellant, alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Limitation in Insolvency Petition Initiated by Financial Creditor. Application Under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Held Within Limitation After Excluding Time Spent in SARFAESI Proceedings Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissing an appeal against an order of the National Company ...