Search Results for "appellate interference"

7847 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7847 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal Against Dismissal of Permanent Injunction Suit Over Agricultural Land. Suit Involves Claims of Ownership and Interference by Co-operative Societies and Site Owners Association.

The case originated from a suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff against three defendant societies/associations concerning agricultural...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Irregular Deposit of Rent Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Does Not Bar Eviction. Tenant's failure to deposit rent regularly despite court order justified decree for possession.

The case involves a dispute between the landlord (respondent) and the tenant (applicant) over eviction from a flat in Mumbai. The landlord filed a sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses DISCOM's Appeal in Solar PPA Force Majeure Dispute — Restrictive Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 Affirmed. Government Delays in Approvals Constitute Force Majeure; No Tariff Reduction or Liquidated Damages When Developer Not at Fault.

The Supreme Court of India dismissed appeals by Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for E...