Search Results for "Special Tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Special Tribunal jurisdiction"

4285 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4285 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Ejectment Case Under Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953. Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 25 as Revenue Court Order Was Without Jurisdiction Due to Absence of Landlord-Tenant Relationship and Invalid Sale of Trust Property.

17 Nov 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute over ejectment of a tenant from agricultural land. The appellants, claiming to ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates FEMA Appeals by Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement Against Tribunal's Reduction of Penalty. Appeals Under Section 35 of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 Challenge Reduction of Penalty from Rs.98.35 Crores to Rs.15 Crores in IPL Franchise Foreign Exchange Violations.

13 Dec 2023

The judgment delivered on 13 December 2023 by the Bombay High Court addressed statutory appeals filed by the Special Director, Directorate of Enforcem...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Bihar Government Scheme Can Impose Housing Obligation on Employer in Industrial Dispute. The Industrial Tribunal and Labour Appellate Tribunal Had Upheld the Demand for Quarters, Directing Construction of 15 Units Under the Scheme.

23 Apr 1959

The case arose from an industrial dispute between The Patna Electric Supply Co., Ltd. and its Workers’ Union regarding the demand for housing quarte...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Congress Plea to Disqualify MLA Under Tenth Schedule Due to Resignation Before Speaker's Decision. Court Holds That Resignation Ousts Speaker's Jurisdiction and No Writ Under Article 226 Can Issue to Declare Disqualification.

11 Oct 2017

The Indian National Congress and several of its MLAs filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, seeking a declara...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Pronounces Judgment on Constitutional Validity of Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 2023. The Verdict on the Appeal and Connected Petition Remains Unstated in the Available Excerpt of the Judgment.

8 Jul 2026

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, heard a writ appeal a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matters — Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Setting Aside Award and Remanding for Reconsideration Without Finding Award to Be Void or Inoperative. The Court Held That Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Confer Power of Remand; Only Remedies Are to Uphold, Modify, or Set Aside the Award.

25 Jun 2013

The appellant, Geojit Financial Services Limited (now Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Limited), a stock broker registered with the National Stoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.

21 Jan 2013

The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Occupancy Certificate Proceedings. Land Tribunal's order set aside as it was passed without notice to petitioners and without considering their objections under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

4 Apr 2024

The petitioners, who are agriculturists, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.1...

44 45 46 47 48

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)