Search Results for "Industrial Court discretion"

1600 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1600 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010645132024_1

The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Industrial Development Board in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Board's Failure to Prove Title and Possession Leads to Dismissal of Appeal.

The appeal was filed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) and its officers against the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2012 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Adjudicates Appeals Against NCLT Orders Directing Replacement of Resolution Professional. Issues Pertain to Applicability of Sections 97 and 98 of IBC to Part II CIRP and Interpretation of IBBI Bye-law 23A.

The appeals arise from insolvency proceedings of Hindusthan National Glass & Industries Limited. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Implead Parties in Suit for Specific Performance — Petitioner Lacks Direct Interest in Property and Cannot Compel Performance of Contract Between Others.

The petitioner, Sri K. Lakshmaiah Reddy, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 22.02.2022 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer Orders of Bank Employees — Transfer Policy Not Violative of Service Conditions. Employer's Right to Transfer Upheld as Incident of Service.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. challenging their transfer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in Air India Ltd. — Probationers Have No Right to Be Confirmed and Termination Without Stigma Is Valid.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Jeetendra Krishna Varma (WP 875/2011) and Mayank Mohan Sharma (WP 1427/2015) against Air India Lt...