Search Results for "Inclusion"

1816 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1816 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pension Paid Due to Mistaken Inclusion of Promotional Increment. Recovery of excess payment after six years of retirement held impermissible as per principles against recovery from retired employees.

The petitioner, Tarachand s/o Urkudaji Gajbhiye, a retired government employee, was aggrieved by an order dated 19.1.2016 issued by respondent No. 2, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Refers Conflict on Emergency Parole for POCSO Convicts to Larger Bench. Interpretation of Rule 19(1)(C) of Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 Requires Resolution of Conflicting Decisions on Entitlement of Convicts Under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act.

The petitioner, Pintu Uttam Sonale, a convict under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Protection of Children from S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Daily Wager by Counting Pre-Regularization Service as Qualifying Service Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Continuous Service of Same Nature from 1971 to 2003 Entitles Petitioner to Pension Despite Initial Daily Wage Engagement.

The petitioner, Sayyad Abbas Sayyad Usman, was employed as a watchman/Choukidar on a daily wage basis with the respondents (Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Kru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Follow Rule 13D(2-A) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960 in Elections to Milk Union Board. Court Directs Inclusion of Petitioner Societies in Electoral Process for Mandya District Co-operative Milk Producers Societies Union Ltd.

The petitioners, three milk producers' co-operative societies registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, filed a writ petition u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Directs Inclusion of No-Fault Liability Payment. Tribunal's Award Modified to Reflect Rs.50,000 Already Paid Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Babu @ Balu Narsingrao Pathak, owner of the vehicle involved in a motor accident, filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated ...