Search Results for "village panchayat"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "village panchayat"

1798 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1798 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Engineers in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Police Station Notification. Anti-Corruption Bureau Koppal Lacked Notification Under Section 2(s) of Cr.P.C., Rendering FIR Void.

26 Feb 2021

The batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Land Acquisition Compensation Appeals. Claimants challenge the award of the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired for Karanjwan Dam under the Upper Godavari Project.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Directs Panchayat to Execute Demolition Order and Regularization Authority to Decide Application Expeditiously in Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of Demolition Order. Court accepts undertaking of respondent to demolish if regularization is declined and directs disposal of regularization application within 30 days.

18 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Satish Mathur Tupkar, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking enforcement of a demolition order dated...

High Court

Madras High Court entertained a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash the order dated 24.12.2024 of the District Collector and the consequential notice dated 08.01.2025 by the Block Development Officer regarding building plan violation. The petition arose from allegations that the Hullathi Panchayat locked and sealed the resort buildings claiming that the building plan approval was granted only for residential purpose, despite the petitioner having obtained revision approval under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act.

24 Mar 2025

The writ petition was filed by S.K.S. Resorts India Private Limited, the owner of 1.7 acres of land in Hullathi Panchayat, The Nilgiris District. The ...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Payment of Arrears to Over Head Tank Operator Under Article 226 of Constitution. Inaction by Panchayat Officers in Implementing Pay Revision Order Held Unjustified; Mandamus Issued with Costs.

17 Feb 2025

The writ petition was filed by Valli, an Over Head Tank Operator in Varivayal Village under the third respondent Panchayat, seeking a writ of mandamus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch. 3/4th Majority for Removal of Upa-Sarpanch Must Be Calculated Based on Total Members of Panchayat, Not Only Those Present and Voting.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Archna Phulare, was the Upa-Sarpanch of Shivgaon-Pathari Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was passed against her by 7 votes to 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Disqualified Member's Participation. Motion of no-confidence passed by 2/3rd majority held invalid as it required 3/4th majority of members entitled to sit and vote under Section 35(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

19 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Kishor Baburao Wadaskar Prasad, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Panchala in September 2015. The Gram Panchayat consisted of sev...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of No-Confidence Motion Rules Under Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. Rule 3(1), 3(2), and 3(4) of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayath) Rules, 1994 held intra vires the parent Act.

19 Dec 2019

The petitioner, B.R. Siddaramu, was the Upadhyaksha (Vice President) of Gollahalli Grama Panchayat. He was aggrieved by a notice dated 26.08.2019 issu...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion and resolution invalid.

12 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Sri Harisha I.E., was the President of Ichanahally Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against him by the respondents, wh...

43 44 45 46 47

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)