Search Results for "tax entry"

1515 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1515 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Pharmaceutical and Polyester Manufacturers for LBT Exemption Under Rule 28(6) of BPMC (LBT) Rules, 2010. Court Holds That Exemption for Goods Used in Export Covers All Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exported Finished Products, Irrespective of Place of Processing.

These three connected writ petitions filed by pharmaceutical and polyester manufacturing companies challenged the orders of the Aurangabad Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 43B Explanation 3C. Interest Converted into Debentures Not Deemed Actually Paid as Per Retrospective Amendment, Disallowing Deduction Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from an appeal by M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-III, concerning the interpretation of Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Service Tax Demand on Construction of Port Services. Services by way of construction of original works pertaining to a port are exempt from service tax under Notification No.25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012, Entry No.14.

The petitioners, JSW Dharmatar Port Pvt. Ltd. and JSW Jaigarh Port Ltd., are companies engaged in developing and operating ports. In the course of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Bogus Purchase Case — GP Rate Restricted to 15% on Alleged Bogus Purchases. The court held that when purchases are accepted as genuine but from bogus parties, only the profit element embedded in such purchases can be taxed, not the entire purchase amount.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate ...