Search Results for "import declaration"

916 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 916 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Demand Against Ex-Director for Company Dues — No Personal Liability Without Statutory Provision. Section 142(1)(c)(ii) of Customs Act, 1962 does not authorise recovery from a former director who ceased to be associated with the company before the demand.

The petitioner, Purshottam Das Gupta, an 86-year-old senior citizen, was formerly a director of Sujata Verbatim Limited (later renamed PDG Infotech Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — MRT Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Restoration of Possession Cannot Be Ordered Without Hearing the Landlord Under Section 84 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, Kacharu B. Ambekar and others, are the successors-in-interest of the original landlord of agricultural lands bearing Gat No.333 (47 A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Lease vs. Licence Dispute — Agreement Dated 1st March 1977 Held to Create Licence, Not Lease. Court Interprets Clauses of Agreement to Determine Intention of Parties, Finding No Transfer of Interest in Property.

The dispute in this second appeal arises from a suit filed by the appellant, Prakash Ganesh Lotlikar, against the respondent, Joel Avelino Noronha, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal by Patel Engineering Ltd in Import Misdeclaration Case. Confiscation of Goods and Penalty Upheld for Violation of Sections 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, Patel Engineering Ltd, filed a Customs Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the concurrent findings of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Clarifies Certified Copy Requirement for Filing Appeal Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016. The court held that an uncertified copy can be filed, but limitation runs from receipt of certified copy.

This judgment arises from a reference made to a single member bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai due to a dissent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Plaint and Amendment in Specific Performance Suit — Consent Decree Not Binding on Third Party. Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Limitation Was a Mixed Question of Fact and Law.

The petitioner, Bharat Mulji Khona, was the defendant in a suit for specific performance filed by M/s. Fiza Construction Company (respondent no.1) see...