Search Results for "hotel property"

1361 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1361 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal as Not Maintainable Under Section 29(2) of Bombay Rent Act. Appeal Against Order Passed Under Section 29(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 is Barred by Sub-section (2).

The appellant, Narishala Society, filed a second appeal against the judgment and order of the Small Causes Court, Pune, in Civil Appeal No.833 of 2007...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree for Unlawful Subletting Under Bombay Rent Act. Tenant's Induction of Third Parties into Suit Premises Constitutes Subletting Under Section 13(1)(e) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The petitioners (defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 20th December 1997 passed by the learned IV Extra Joint District Judge, Pune in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 323 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nazimoddin Mohammaddin alias Nasiroddin, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 32...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Orders Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Petitioners' Custody Status and Relied on Unverified In-Camera Statements.

The petitioners, Pravin Nivrutti Pagare, Sunil Mahadeo Khandagale, and Vijay Premnath Gosavi, were detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Retiring Partners Held Capital Expenditure. Amount of Rs.1,34,678 paid to retiring partners under Memorandum of Understanding is capital expenditure not deductible as revenue expenditure.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee, Mandovi Hotel Pvt....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Ejectment Order in Rent Dispute. Subletting Without Landlord's Consent Under Section 15 of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Justifies Eviction.

The petitioner, Rasiklal Kumbha Gala, was the original respondent in an ejectment application filed by the respondent, Manilal Ravji, before the Addit...