Search Results for "control samples"

487 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 487 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence and Flawed Investigation. Conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt.

The appellant, Snehal Dias, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS, Mapusa, for the murder of Naresh Dourado and robbery of his car and other items,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Decree for Infringement of Trademark and Copyright in Colgate Tooth Powder Can. Plaintiffs proved that defendants used a deceptively similar can for tooth powder, infringing registered trademark No. 290361 and copyright in the artistic work.

The plaintiffs, Colgate-Palmolive Company and Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court against M/s. Hindustan Rimmer a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Customs Mis-declaration Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invocable Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion. Importer's Mis-declaration for Claiming Notification Benefit Does Not Automatically Attract Penalty Under Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Revenue) against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Restoring Fair Price Shop Licence in Absence of Notice to Complainant. Revision Filed by Licencee Allowed Without Hearing Complainant Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Shashikant Ghadge, along with other villagers, complained to the Tahsildar about mismanagement and irregularities by respondent No.5, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. The court affirmed that the appellant's act of hitting the deceased's head against a wall with intent to cause death constituted murder under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Umesh Suresh Vale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of Gautam Chandramani. The incid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Interest Demand on Bonded Goods Under Customs Act. Interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 is Mandatory and Not Waivable Even for Delays Caused by Customs Authorities.

The petitioners, M/s SBEC Sugar Limited and its shareholder S.S. Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Directors and Company in Food Adulteration Matter Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Failure to Show That Accused Were In Charge of and Responsible for Business Conduct at Time of Offence Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The applicants, who were directors and a company (Marico Industries Ltd.), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Woman Accused of Murder in Circumstantial Evidence Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dipee Mahendrasing Dogra, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of one Robin Masih. The prosecution case was that the appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on rate analysis and rejection of counterclaims under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Union of India, through the Executive Engineer, CPWD, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging ...