Search Results for "averment"

2041 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2041 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Against Trespassers for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 9A CPC. Court holds that the suit is not maintainable as the property is wakf property and the Wakf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction under the Wakf Act, 1995.

The plaintiffs, Valimohamed Haji Allarakha Sonawala Wakf through its trustees and mutawallis, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declarat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Civil Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Mining Rejects Dumping Suit. Limitation and Jurisdiction Objections Not Decided at Preliminary Stage Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as Plaint Disclosed Continuing Cause of Action and Civil Court Jurisdiction.

The respondent, Gurudas G. Pai, filed Special Civil Suit No.34/2011/A before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim, against the petitioner, Ms. S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Despite Defendant's Preliminary Objections. Plaintiff's Mark 'ESSEL' Found to Have Acquired Distinctiveness and Defendant's Use Likely to Cause Confusion.

The plaintiff, Essel Propack Ltd., filed a suit in 2010 against Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and another defendant for trademark infringement and passing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Amendment Order in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought Changed Nature of Suit and Was Barred by Limitation. Order 6 Rule 17 CPC amendment cannot be allowed if it introduces a new case beyond limitation period and alters the character of the suit.

The petitioners, Fr. Ralin De Souza and Ashley Do Rosario, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26.02.2016 passed by the learned Civil Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Domicile Requirement for Minority Quota Admissions. Clause 18(18) of Information Brochure requiring minority candidates to attach Domicile Certificate for CAP held valid and not violative of Articles 14 and 30 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Oslen A. Dsilva and another, claiming to be students belonging to minority communities, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — No Concluded Contract via Email Exchange. Unsigned Memorandum of Understanding Not Binding as Parties Did Not Intend to Be Bound Until Execution of Formal Agreement.

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of a flat owned by the respondent (orig...