Search Results for "Settlement Officer"

2536 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2536 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Clarified. Labour Court's Order Rejecting Approval for Dismissal Restored as It Did Not Exceed Its Limited Jurisdiction.

The appeal arose from a dispute between John D'Souza, a workman, and the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). The workman joined as a b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SECOND APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2008

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Quashing Punishment for Illegal Strike. Dispute Centers on Whether Industrial Court Could Interfere with Disciplinary Action and Draw Adverse Inference from Alleged Minutes of Meeting.

These are six writ petitions filed by the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenging the common order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Kidnapping and Ransom Case Due to Amicable Settlement. FIR Under Sections 365, 307, 386 IPC and Arms Act Quashed on Finding That Dispute Was Private and Continuation Would Be Abuse of Process.

The case arose from a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed jointly by the accused and the complainant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reinstatement Order for Daily Wage Worker in Banking Company — 93 Days of Service Does Not Confer Right to Regularisation. The court held that a daily wage worker who worked for 93 days as a badli sepoy is not entitled to reinstatement or permanent absorption.

The petitioner, Dena Bank, a banking company constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...