Search Results for "Security Interest Enforcement"

1414 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1414 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Jurisdiction Dispute. Disputed Question of Fact Regarding Agricultural Land Cannot Be Decided Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC; Issue Must Be Tried in Suit.

The applicant, Sundaram Home Finance Limited, a secured creditor, filed a Civil Revision Application challenging an order of the Civil Judge, Junior D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Summary Judgment in Bank Guarantee Enforcement Case. Court holds that invocation of bank guarantee is independent of underlying contract disputes and must be honoured unless fraud or irretrievable injustice is established.

The case arises from a summary suit filed by Bank of India (the respondent) against the appellants, who were the original defendants, for enforcement ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Release of Secured Asset on Partial Payment Under SARFAESI Act. The court held that Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 requires full payment of dues for redemption, and partial payment does not entitle the borrower to reclaim the property.

The dispute arose between a bank, as secured creditor, and a borrower over the enforcement of security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Process in NI Act Case Against Sick Company's Managing Director. Court holds that declaration of a company as sick under SICA does not absolve its directors from criminal liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Omesh Keshav Karnik, Managing Director of Phoenix Fine Chem Pvt. Ltd., a sick company, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bomba...