Search Results for "Part consideration"

21229 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21229 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Passes Interim Orders Directing Restoration of Lake and Prevention of Mangrove Destruction in Navi Mumbai. Modification of Development Plan to Permit Golf Course Raised Public Interest Concerns.

The public interest litigations were filed to address the systematic destruction of mangroves and wetlands in Navi Mumbai. The petitioners in PIL 218/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka, Gulbarga Bench, hears appeal against part decree in O.S. No. 125/2004 granting specific performance of oral agreement for sale.

The dispute arises from a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of industrial property. The plaintiff (respondent No. 1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Freeze on Mangrove Destruction in Maharashtra and Orders Comprehensive Satellite Mapping to Identify Protection Areas. High Court Recognizes Ecological Importance of Mangroves and Applies Precautionary Principle to Prevent Further Damage Pending Final Adjudication.

The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Bombay Environmental Action Group and another before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, seeking prote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance Appeal Despite Unproven Part Payment. Failure to Prove Payment of Rs.300 Does Not Justify Refusal of Specific Performance When Plaintiff Shows Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 6th June 1974, whereby the respondent-defendant agreed to...