Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &
26 Mar 2025...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act"
819 result(s) found
Found 819 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Kunbi Caste Certificate for Gram Panchayat Member. Committee Failed to Consider Relevant Documents and Conduct Proper Inquiry Under Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000.
11 Apr 2023The petitioner, Swapnil Baban Shinde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 7th February 202...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grampanchayat Election Nomination Rejection Due to Bar Under Article 243-O(b) of Constitution. Writ Petition Held Not Maintainable as Remedy Lies Only Through Election Petition Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.
8 Jul 2021The petitioner, Gazala Bi Saddam Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of her nominatio...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of 41 Agriculturists Challenging Eviction from Government Land Leased to Maharashtra State Farming Corporation. Petitioners Failed to Establish Tenancy Rights Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and Were Held to Be Encroachers.
12 Feb 2020The petitioners, 41 individuals, filed a writ petition challenging their eviction from land in Rastapur, Taluka Rahata, District Ahmednagar. The land ...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Orders in Sarpanch Election Dispute — Criminal Miscellaneous Application Under Section 156(3) CrPC Held Not Maintainable for Challenging Election. The court held that the election of a Sarpanch can only be challenged by an election petition under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and not by a criminal miscellaneous application.
18 Oct 2019The petitioner, Santosh Vitthal Awate, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging two orders: (1) an order dated 14 Decem...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Section 133 CrPC Proceedings Initiated Based on Panchayat Complaint — Dispute Over Fencing on Private Property Not a Public Nuisance Under Section 133 CrPC. The court held that proceedings under Section 133 CrPC cannot be initiated for a private property dispute where there is a civil dispute over title and possession, and the Magistrate must apply judicial mind before acting on a police report.
15 Feb 2019The petitioner, Mr. Alexio Travasso, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Pro...
- 160
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
26 Oct 2018The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates PIL and Writ Petitions on Hoarding Permissions on Airport Land. Petitioners Allege Non-Compliance with MMC Act, 1888 Sections 328 and 328A and CRZ Regulations.
1 Mar 2018A public interest litigation and two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the erection of hoardings by an advertising co...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging Removal Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Minister's Order Confirmed Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Error. The Court held that the Minister's order dismissing the appeal against removal was not amenable to writ jurisdiction as no error of law or procedure was established.
16 Mar 2016The Petitioner, Sau. Shubhangi Sharad Gondhali, was elected as a member of the Revdanda Grampanchayat in June 2013 and subsequently elected as Sarpanc...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Against Removal Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Upholds Minister's Order Confirming Removal for Misappropriation of Funds. Court holds that the Sarpanch's failure to deposit collected taxes and misuse of funds constitutes 'misappropriation' under Section 39(1)(b) and that the Minister's order was based on sufficient material and not perverse.
16 Mar 2016The Petitioner, Sau. Shubhangi Sharad Gondhali, was elected as a member of the Revdanda Grampanchayat in June 2013 and subsequently elected as Sarpanc...
- 235
