PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.259 OF 2009
10 Mar 2010The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Bhimshakti Vichar Manch, a registered trust, and another petitioner, challenging the Foodgrain Based Disti...
Search Results for "Financial Commissioner"
3037 result(s) found
Found 3037 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Cases on Disallowance of Interest Expenditure on Tax-Free Securities. Held that Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 mandates disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in total income, and the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction before invoking Rule 8D.
16 Apr 2019The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging orders of the Income Tax App...
- 396
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Award of Quality Audit Contract Without Tenders. Quality Audit of Roads Held Not Covered Under Section 72 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, as It Is a Professional Service, Not Execution of Work or Supply of Goods.
14 Dec 2012The petitioner, Niyaz Ahmed Vanu, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the award of a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...
- 94
High Court
Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Revenue’s Appeals Against Single Judge’s Order Quashing Section 153C Notices; Weighs Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Natural Justice Concerns.
22 Jan 2024The present judgment arises from a batch of writ appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 12.08.2022 passed by a Single Judge of the ...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MCGM Contract Awards in Public Interest Litigation. Court Finds No Irregularity in Tender Process and Upholds Validity of Contracts for Road Works.
5 Jul 2016The present Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Jayshree Ramakant Khadilkar Pande challenging the award of four contracts by the Municipal C...
- 144
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition on Interest on Refund Under Goa VAT Act — Interest Payable from Date of Assessment Order Determining Refund. Section 33(2) of the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 mandates interest from the date the amount became refundable, which is the date of the assessment order, not the date of actual refund.
16 Oct 2019The petitioner, United Spirits Ltd. (formerly McDowell and Co. Ltd.), a registered dealer under the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005, filed returns for t...
- 159
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suo Motu Revision Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Initiated After 48 Years — Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Notice Vitiate Proceedings. The court held that the power of suo motu revision must be exercised within a reasonable period, and a delay of 48 years is unreasonable; further, the order passed without notice to the grantee violates natural justice and is void.
9 Mar 2020The petitioner, Mr. Ramakrishna M, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...
- 42
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case for Fresh Trial Due to Procedural Irregularity in Demarcation Report. The High Court's dismissal of the suit was set aside as the First Appellate Court had relied on other evidence besides the Commissioner's report, and the matter required fresh consideration.
4 Feb 2019The case involves a land dispute between the appellants (plaintiffs) and respondents (defendants) over Khasra No. 146. The plaintiffs alleged that the...
- 239
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Commissioner's Suspension of CHA Licence for Employee Misconduct — Suspension Pending Inquiry Valid Without Prior Show Cause Notice Under Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004. The court held that suspension is an interim measure to safeguard revenue and does not require a show cause notice before issuance, as it is not a final penalty.
29 Nov 2006The case involves two appeals arising from an order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 4th April 2006. The Commis...
- 84
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights
8 Nov 2024The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...
- 2176
