Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Student Attendance Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII CPC not available to re-agitate merits where examination already concluded.

The applicant, Ankita Jagannath Sonawale, a post-graduate law student at Maharashtra National Law University, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, was disallowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order on Condonation of Delay in Review Application — Limitation for Review Under Section 17 of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 Governed by Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Non-Examination of Key Witness and Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act. Sale Deed in Favour of Plaintiffs Proved Valid, Subsequent Transfers by Vendor After Losing Title Held Void.

The present First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the appellants-original plaintiffs challenging the judgme...