Search Results for "Assurance"

3153 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3153 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Transit Policy Covers Third-Party Risk Even for Chassis. Insurer liable to pay compensation for death of passenger in chassis covered by transit policy as policy covers third-party risk under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the New India Assurance Company Ltd. challenging the award of compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Suicide Not Proved as Consequence of Accident Injuries. Claimant failed to establish causal link between accidental injuries and suicide, thus insurer not liable under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal by the New India Assurance Company Limited against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Osmanabad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Insurance Company and Owner in Workmen's Compensation Case. Cleaner's Death in Accident During Employment Held Compensable Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The case involves two appeals under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (Insurance Company) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Alleged License Breach. The court held that the insurer failed to prove that the driver lacked a valid driving license, and thus the award of compensation was upheld.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased Ramji Bhoyar, who died in a head-on collision ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim by Treating Petition Under Section 166 Instead of Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimants entitled to just compensation based on actual income and future prospects, not structured formula.

The appellants, being the widow, minor children, and father of the deceased Diwakar Pawade, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Minor Injured in Motor Accident — Permanent Disability Assessed at 70% with Multiplier of 18. The court held that the Tribunal erred in assessing disability at 30% and applied correct multiplier and future prospects as per law.

The appellant, Ketaki Milind Kulkarni, a minor aged 8 years at the time of the accident, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Wife in Husband's Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellant shared common intention with her sons to commit murder.

The appellant, Shahenaj Amjed Shaikh, was convicted by the II Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur for the murder of her husband Amjed under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses. Acquittal of Nine Accused under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148 read with 149 IPC and Bombay Police Act Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Sessions Case No.113 of 2006 dated 14.05.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tenders for Take Home Ration and Hot Cooked Meal Programs. Court finds no violation of Supreme Court directions as impugned tenders were not issued by State Government but by Municipal Corporation.

The petitioner, Mumbai V. Konkan Vibhagiya Mahila Aydyogik Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha Mahasangh Ltd., a federation of women self-help groups registered ...