Search Results for "section 23(3)"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC in Dowry Murder Case; Questions Sustainability of Conviction When Co-Accused Were Acquitted. Appeal Seeks Re-appreciation of Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Opinion on Strangulation; No Final Verdict in Provided Text.

In this criminal appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, the appellant, accused No.1, challenged his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Meritorious Candidate in Favor of Preferential Age Candidate for Backlog ST Post. The 2001 Rules' Age Preference Overrides Merit When Advertised as Mode of Selection Under Karnataka Reservation Act, 1990.

The case involves a service dispute between two Scheduled Tribe candidates for a single post of Assistant Professor in English at Bangalore University...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ashok, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shimoga, sitting at Bhadravathi, in Sessions Case No.94/2015 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Murder and Unlawful Assembly Case. Common Object Established for Offences Under Sections 302, 324, 143, 144, 147, 148 read with Section 149 IPC.

The appellants, Mohd. Hanif, Mohd. Azam, Mohd. Munaf, Mohd. Ansar, Mohd. Irfan, and Mohd. Amir, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Akola, for offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...