Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order Declaring Kishanrao Kadam as Tenant; Landlord Relies on Earlier Civil Decree and Findings of Tenancy Authorities
4 Jul 2012...
Search Results for "open delivery"
1780 result(s) found
Found 1780 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petitions and Civil Revision Application Challenging Execution of Decree for Specific Performance; Executing Court Had Directed Sale Deed Execution. The dispute arose from a decree in First Appeal No. 790 of 1991 requiring deposit of consideration and execution of sale deed of about 18.07 acres land at Mouza Dhaba, Nagpur.
6 Jan 2011The matter comprised three connected proceedings—Writ Petition Nos. 113 and 1691 of 2010, and Civil Revision Application No. 76 of 2009—filed befo...
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation, as the suit sought recovery of development management fees and security deposit without any specific instances of imminent threat.
11 Nov 2024The plaintiff, Ekta Housing Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Shraddha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. and two individual guarantors for rec...
- 923
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case — Related Party Transactions Must Be Valued Under Rule 11 CEVR Read with Section 4(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Circular dated 01.07.2002 Clarifying Valuation Method for Mixed Sales to Related and Unrelated Parties Is Binding and Correctly Applied by Revenue.
5 Dec 2022The present Civil Appeal arises from an order dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, ...
- 231
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Timely Filling of Vacancies in Information Commissions to Ensure Effective Implementation of Right to Information Act, 2005. The Court held that the right to information is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) and that vacancies in Information Commissions must be filled promptly to prevent backlogs and ensure transparency.
15 Feb 2019This Public Interest Litigation was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking effective implementation of the Right to Information A...
- 302
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST on Lotteries — Holds Lottery as Actionable Claim and Movable Property Under CGST Act. Levy of GST on Face Value of Lottery Tickets Without Abating Prize Money Upheld as Constitutional.
3 Dec 2020The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorized agent for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, filed a ...
- 386
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Customs Public Notice on IGM Amendment. Public Notice Prohibiting Amendment of Consignee Name After Bill of Entry Filed Held Reasonable and Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.
15 Mar 2010The petitioner, Mr. Rakesh Dhir, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Public Notice No.2/1010 dated 14th J...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.
20 Jan 2011The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...
- 135
High Court
High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award in Maritime Demurrage Dispute — Claim Time-Barred Under Charterparty Clause 24. The court upheld the majority arbitrators' finding that the demurrage claim was received beyond the 45-day period stipulated in clause 24 of the Tanker Voyage Charterparty, and thus the claim was time-barred.
4 Jan 2012The petitioner, Axios Navigation Co. Ltd., a shipowner, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tr...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Limitation and Adverse Possession. The court held that the lower appellate court failed to properly analyze evidence regarding the starting point of limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the plea of adverse possession.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a property dispute in Velim, Goa. The appellants (legal heirs of Egidio Joaquim Fernandes and others) filed a suit for possession of...
- 108
